← All guides
Water-glycol / HFC

Water-Glycol Hydraulic Fluid and Seal Compatibility: Do Not Assume Your Standard Seal Is Suitable

Technical review: 2026-10-15 · HydraResolve

Fire-resistant water-glycol (HFC) fluids are common in high-fire-risk environments, but a seal that works well in mineral oil is not automatically suitable. The exact compound and operating temperature matter.

Build a compound-specific compatibility request

  1. Identify the exact HFC fluid
  2. Identify every seal compound
  3. Record operating conditions
  4. Obtain application-specific review
The result of this workflow is a documented supplier decision. It is not an automatic material approval.
On this page
  1. Build a compound-specific compatibility request
  2. Why water-glycol changes the selection problem
  3. Avoid blanket material rules
  4. What to collect before choosing a seal
  5. When an existing seal fails after a fluid change
  6. Information that changes the supplier answer
  7. Illustrative example: “PTFE seal” is not a complete specification
  8. Preserve evidence when failure follows a conversion
  9. Was this guide helpful?

Why water-glycol changes the selection problem

HFC fluids contain a substantial water fraction plus glycol and additives. Compared with mineral oil, that changes lubrication, water exposure and chemical compatibility. Trelleborg notes that high-temperature exposure in water-based fluids can significantly affect sealing materials, and SKF publishes separate compatibility ratings for HFC fluids.

Avoid blanket material rules

Two polyurethane grades can behave differently, and two FKM or HNBR compounds can also have very different HFC ratings. For that reason, statements like “Viton is always better” or “all PU is unsuitable” are too broad for engineering selection.

What to collect before choosing a seal

When an existing seal fails after a fluid change

Keep the failed parts and compare hardness, swelling, cracking and wear against unused material if possible. A fluid conversion can expose seals, hoses, coatings and lubricated interfaces to a different environment, so investigate the system as a whole.

For fire-resistant systems, fluid choice is a safety requirement. Do not convert the machine back to mineral oil simply to suit an existing seal. Select seals and components that are approved for the required fluid.

Related: seal material compatibility and swollen or softened seals.

To connect this inspection with the next repair decision, see Skydrol & Phosphate-Ester Seal Compatibility: Guide and Checker.

Information that changes the supplier answer

Observed situationNext verification
Fluid identityProvide trade name, grade and current supplier documents, including the specified water-content maintenance method.
Complete sealing assemblyList the main ring, energizer, back-up and guide materials. A compatible main ring does not qualify the other components.
Exposure and dutyRecord continuous/peak temperature, motion, pressure and dwell conditions. State what was measured and what is still assumed.

Illustrative example: “PTFE seal” is not a complete specification

A supplier is asked to replace a mineral-oil seal after conversion to HFC. The proposed assembly is described only as PTFE. The missing information includes the ring grade or filler, energizer compound, exact fluid and operating temperature. Ask for a review of the full assembly at those conditions rather than a family-level yes/no answer. Trelleborg highlights the need to evaluate high-temperature exposure together with water-based fluids. The example supplies no compatibility rating, universal temperature ceiling or recommendation to change the machine fluid.

Preserve evidence when failure follows a conversion

Technical references

Use the exact seal manufacturer and machine service data for final selection.

Need to narrow the fault?

Use the interactive tools after the inspection—not instead of it.

Was this guide helpful?

No name or account needed. Your choice stays in this browser unless you allow analytics; then it is sent through Google Analytics without personal-information fields.